VVA Testimony VVA Testimony
VVA Testimony

Testimony of

Vietnam Veterans of America

Presented by

Rick Weidman
Executive Director for Policy & Government Affairs
Vietnam Veterans of America


The President’s FY 2011 Budget Request for Veterans

Before the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
United States House of Representatives

February 4, 2010


Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Buyer, and distinguished Members of the committee. Thank you for giving Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) the opportunity to offer our comments on the President’s Budget Request for FY 2011. All of us at Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) wish to thank the leadership shown by this committee, by the leadership of the Budget Committee and of the Appropriations Committee, as well as the Speaker and the leadership of the entire House of Representatives for your vision in leading the struggle to enact Advance Appropriations. Further, your extraordinary vision in securing the dramatic increases in funding for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in both the medical system and in the Veterans Benefits Administration in the last three years has been nothing short of laudatory, and we applaud you for it.

First let me note that Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) is one of the many organizations that has endorsed the Independent Budget of the Veterans Service Organizations (IBVSO). We commend our colleagues at the Veterans of Foreign Wars, AMVETS, Paralyzed Veterans of America, and the Disabled America Veterans for their excellent work on this major undertaking, and thank them for the strenuous effort it takes to produce this excellent document each year.

Further, VVA commends President Obama and his Administration for submitting a budget request that continues to move us toward the goal of full funding of the health care and benefits earned by virtue of military service. It is a relatively “lean year” in regard to the Federal Budget request, yet the President has recognized that caring for “he - or she - who hath borne the battle” and their survivors is both part of the cost of war as well as the duty of the nation and our citizenry. Therefore the President has exempted programs that serve veterans from the projected budget freeze along with the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and other programs vital to protecting the country.

While VVA does endorse the IBVSO in the main, and lauds the President’s Budget Request, there are a few areas that we must comment where we see some needs that are not included in either the IBVSO or in the President’s Budget Request for VA.


First, VVA strongly supports the need to indicate where some of the appropriations increases need to be focused by VA managers, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) services. The reason for this is that all too often in the past Congress has appropriated additional funds to deal with specific needs, and the money has been redirected at other areas of operation. The well documented instance of money specifically directed by the Congress to start to more properly address the scourge of Hepatitis C a decade ago is one glaring incident of this behavior by VA. Even after being pressed hard by the Congress and the General Accounting Office (GAO), VA could not account for the majority of the funds that were supposedly directed toward correcting the deficiencies of the VA health care system in diagnosing and treating Hepatitis C. There is therefore a natural inclination to ensure that this type of thing does not happen again, both on the part of top managers in the Executive branch and in the Congress.

However, because so much of the funding was centrally directed from Washington, VISN Directors and VA Medical Center Directors reported to us last tear that they could not meet certain needs because they only got a small increase of funds from FY’08 to FY’09 and/or FY’09 to FY’10. Usually those reported increases were from 1% to 3%. This of course caused VVA to ask how this could be, given that there was a much larger increase than that in the appropriation of the medical operations account? Where did the money go? We were told that it was in the special accounts, such as for PTSD. However, some of the unmet needs that local VA managers said they could not meet because of tight budgets were for additional clinicians to deal with PTSD problems of young soldiers returned from the current conflicts.

The argument against making medical care part of the mandatory side of the budget as opposed to keeping it where it is now, in the discretionary side of domestic spending was that Congress would not have adequate control over how the funds were spent. That was persuasive to the veterans’ community, so all agreed that we should go to advance appropriations. With the strong leadership here in the House, and Senator Akaka and his colleagues in the Senate, as well as President Obama, we have achieved this important milestone. As you know, VVA’s top legislative agenda item for the 11th Congress was Advance Appropriations for VA health care. Now that this has been achieved, our top legislative agenda item is to assist the Congress in securing much greater accountability in both the efficiency and effectiveness of how each appropriated dollar is spent. What we are saying is that the Director of each Veterans’ Integrated Service Network (VISN) and of each VA Medical Center (VAMC) must be given funds to be able to handle the increased costs of everything from electricity to salary to supplies, and then held accountable for how well they use those dollars to deliver high quality medical care to every eligible veteran. VVA suggest that several billion be added to the pool of funds that is sent out to the VISNs under the allocation model. VVA further suggest that Congress direct VA to re-examine the Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation (VERA) model to make it a more finely tuned instrument for allotting resources. At present the VA medical facilities in the north are being shortchanged because the veterans who have resources move south, leaving generally the veterans who are poorer, sicker, and in need of more medical services than the more affluent ones who move to warmer climates. The two tiered system currently employed does not sufficiently account for this phenomena, thereby leaving those VISNs in the north without adequate resources to meet the needs of the veterans in their catchment area.

This does not mean that the President’s request should not ask for targeted dollars (e.g., for PTSD, for increased services to homeless veterans, etc.), but that as this is passed down to the local level for actual delivery of services, how much goes where needs to be transparent. VVA National President wrote to VA on April 9, 2009 asking for the allocation by VSN and by VAMC of medical care dollars. While it was partly answered within 30 days, the only information provided was for the previous (FY’08) Fiscal Year. It is now almost halfway through the second quarter of FY 2010, and we are still waiting for that answer, despite having made repeated efforts to secure same. This is just not acceptable.

Need for Much Greater Transparency in VHA

It is clear to us that mechanisms to achieve a much higher degree of transparency in all parts of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) needs to be restored, and the trend toward secretiveness that started in 2003-2004 needs to be sharply reversed. There is no better way of securing the undivided attention of the permanent managers employed in the VHA than to make such mandates part of the appropriations process/language, both in the text of the law and in the report language. VVA encourages the Committee to suggest possible language to the Budget and Appropriations Committees in your views and estimates statement.

Further, there needs to be much more consultation and sharing of information between key officials in the VHA and leaders of the veterans’ community. The fact that much of the meetings of the Seriously Mentally Ill Advisory Committee now meets in secret, and the Advisory Committee on PTSD meets totally in secret should give everyone pause, particularly after the mis-steps and serious problems with these services at VA over the last four or five years.

Outreach and Education to Open the System to ALL Eligible Veterans

VVA encourages the Congress to continue and accelerate the lifting of the restrictions imposed in January 2003, and to allow so-called Priority 8 veterans to register and use the system. As a key element in this effort, VVA strongly urges the Congress to mandate that there be a line item in each division of VA specifically for outreach and education, and that all of these efforts be coordinated through the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Public Affairs. Having been turned away one or more times by the VA, many of the veterans who they are trying to reach are very skeptical (to say the least) about responding to any letters that VA may send them to ask them to come in and register for health care services.

If it is to be successful, this effort must be coordinated, done on a media market by media market basis, and involve the Veterans Service Organizations and other key players if it is to be successful in drawing these veterans back to VA.

Veterans Economic Opportunity

While VVA supports adding additional claims processors to the Compensation and Pension system, it is equally important to add additional staff to the rolls of VA Vocational Rehabilitation. VVA strongly favors reorganizing VA to create a fourth element of VA that would be known as the Veterans Economic Opportunity Administration, giving the current Secretary the opportunity to establish a new corporate culture in the VEOA that focuses on helping veterans to be as autonomous and as independent as possible. Frankly, getting, and keeping, veterans who are homeless off of the street a major goal of VA should make expansion of the VA Vocational Rehabilitation program a top priority, both for adding rehabilitation specialists, and for adding more employment placement specialists. There are currently less than 100 employment placement specialists for the entire nation. We have excellent leadership at the top of VA Vocational Rehabilitation Service now. It is time to give her the staff and the resources needed to assist veterans to obtain and sustain meaningful employment at a living wage. It is important that we add at least 400 staff members to the VA Voc Rehab staff, with many of those being placement specialist. If we can add 4,000 new staff members to process claims, then we should be able to add 400 staff to help veterans return to work,

VA Research

While VVA supports the request for $590 million for VA Research & Development, we hope that all recognize that this is not nearly enough for the tasks at hand. Frankly, much of these funds go to research projects that keep the medical “stars” at VA in the VAMC that are affiliated with a medical school. This is fine, and a useful function. However, there is a glaring need for funding into the wounds, maladies, injuries, illnesses, and medical conditions that stem from service by American citizens in our Armed Forces. The National Institutes (NIH) does virtually no specific veteran related research. Similarly, the same is largely true of the Center for Disease Control (CDC), the National Academies for the Advancement of Sciences (NAAS), and the Agency for Health Research Quality (AHRQ). While VVA strongly supports the work of all of these fine institutions as the only VSO to be a member of the “Research America!” coalition, we also know that there is an immediate and pressing need for veteran specific research. This vitally needed research would include, but not be limited to, projects such as research into the genochromosonal effects of Agent Orange and other toxins across multiple generations, possibly causing health anomalies in grandchildren and great-grandchildren of veterans exposed. Or, similarly, the consequences in regard to MS or MS-like conditions in veterans or the possible birth defects of children of those exposed to the cloud of chemical and biological weapons detonated in Iraq at the end of Gulf War I.


If it is necessary to create a new branch of VA that would be called the Division of Extramural research in order to make it possible to have such directed research grants available to those inside and outside of VA on a competitive basis, then VVA recommend that we move in that direction, and fund these activities to the level of at least $2 Billion by the year 2015, with commensurate increases of $260 + million each year to reach that level. Frankly this is important both for the health of current and future veterans already exposed, but also as a force health protection activity that will assist in preventing such maladies in the future, which makes it necessary for our national security.

In this regard in the short term, VVA strongly urges the Congress to allocate and additional $30 million for VA to begin to analyze and study the mountains of epidemiological evidence that it has on veterans of every generation, to meet Secretary Shinseki’s desire that we not “wait for an Army to die” but rather get answers about patterns of health care problems now, without for prospective studies in the future.

Automating VA IT Functions and Outreach

VA has an ambitious set of proposals to bring the department into the 21st century, and VVA enthusiastically supports these initiatives. However, we are still troubled that VA wants an electronic medical record system that can communicate with the Department of Defense and the private sector, but which will still not be able to communicate with the Compensation & Pension Service.

Further, while we can all be proud that the VA’s electronic health care record “VistA” is so popular that it is now being exported to the private sector, VVA is still troubled that this is occurring without a field being added for military history, thereby sending an implicit false message to the private sector that exposures and experiences in military service have no significant impact on the long term health care risks for veterans. I think it is safe to say that most of know this to not be the case for all too many veterans.

Mr. Chairman, thank you for this opportunity to share our thinking and recommendations on these matters.


Funding Statement
February 4, 2010

The national organization Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) is a non-profit veteran’s membership organization registered as a 501(c) (19) with the Internal Revenue Service. VVA is also appropriately registered with the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives in compliance with the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995.

VVA is not currently in receipt of any federal grant or contract, other than the routine allocation of office space and associated resources in VA Regional Offices for outreach and direct services through its Veterans Benefits Program (Service Representatives). This is also true of the previous two fiscal years.

For Further Information, Contact:
Executive Director for Policy & Government Affairs
Vietnam Veterans of America
(301) 585-4000, extension 127


Richard F. “Rick” Weidman serves as Executive Director for Policy & Government Affairs on the National Staff of Vietnam Veterans of America. As such, he is the primary spokesperson for VVA in Washington. He served as a 1-A-O Army Medical Corpsman during the Vietnam war, including service with Company C, 23rd Med, AMERICAL Division, located in I Corps of Vietnam in 1969.

Mr. Weidman was part of the staff of VVA from 1979 to 1987, serving variously as Membership Services Director, Agency Liaison, and Director of Government Relations. Rick left VVA staff in 1987 to serve in the Administration of Governor Mario M. Cuomo (NY) as statewide director of veterans’ employment & training (State Veterans Programs Administrator) for the New York State Department of Labor. From 1995 to 1997 he served as Senior Advisor to the Chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee of the New York State Assembly. He returned to the VVA staff in 1998.

He has served as Consultant on Legislative Affairs to the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans (NCHV), and served at various times on the VA Readjustment Advisory Committee, the Secretary of Labor’s Advisory Committee on Veterans Employment & Training, the President’s Committee on Employment of Persons with Disabilities - Subcommittee on Disabled Veterans, Advisory Committee on veterans’ entrepreneurship at the Small Business Administration, and numerous other advocacy posts in veteran affairs. He was recently elected to another term as Chairman of the Veterans Entrepreneurship Task Force (VET-Force), which is the consortium of some major veterans groups and military groups as well as veteran and service disabled veteran small business owners that is dedicated to expanding opportunities for veterans, particularly disabled veterans, to own and successfully operate their own small business, to include seeking to secure better Federal procurement policies and practices.

Mr. Weidman was an instructor and administrator at Johnson State College (Vermont) in the 1970s, where he was also active in community and veterans affairs. He attended Colgate University (B.A., 1967), and did graduate study at the University of Vermont.

He is married and has four children.

vva logo small©2006-2010, Vietnam Veterans of America. All Rights Reserved. | Report Website Errors Here