Connect With VVA VVA on Facebook Faces of Agent Orange on Twitter VVA on YouTube
Find A Service Officer
vietnam veterans of america
vva logo

September/October Issue

red star bulletThe Veteran Departments : Featured Stories / Letters / President's Message / VVAF Report / Government Relations / Ask The Parliamentarian / Veterans Benefits Update / Membership Affairs Committee Report / Legislators View / ETABO Committee Report / PTSD Substance Abuse Comittee Report / TAPS / Region 7 Report / AVVA Report / SHAD/Project 112 Task Force Report / Veterans Against Drugs Task Force Report / VetsConnect Report / Homeless Veterans Task Force Report / Women Veterans Committee Report / Arts of War / Book Review / Membership Notes / Chapter of The Year / Locator / Reunions

2010: Jan/Feb
2009: Jan/Feb | mar/apr
| may/june | july/Aug | sept/oct | Nov/DeC
2008: Jan/Feb | mar/apr | may/june | july/Aug | sept/oct | Nov/DeC
2007: Jan/Feb | MAR/APR | MAY/JUNE | july/aug | SEPT/OCT | Nov/DeC
2006: July/Aug | SEPT/OCT | nov/dec

By Rep. Steve Buyer, Chair,
House Veterans’ Affairs Committee

The July-August issue of The VVA Veteran included a critical performance review of the Veterans Employment and Training Service (VETS). I agree that, as currently organized, the system is inconsistent in putting veterans—especially disabled veterans—in good jobs.

To begin the process of evolving veterans’ employment services into a high-performing program, the House passed H.R. 3082, which would make several basic changes to how VETS funds and measures the performance of state employment services. The bill would improve hiring and training processes for Disabled Veterans’ Outreach Programs (DVOPS) and Local Veterans’ Employment Representatives (LVERs), set several requirements that states must meet as conditions of receiving the DVOP/LVER grant from VETS, establish pilot programs for licensing and certification, establish a measure of competition for employment services, and add a representative of the National Governors Association to the VETS Advisory Committee.

Based on observing the performance of VETS during my 14 years in Congress, I believe the basic design of the program is flawed. The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs constantly hears from senior-level corporate hiring officials who are eager to hire veterans but don’t know where to find them. Our first reply is to ask them if they know their local LVERs or their state’s Director of Veterans Employment and Training. Too often they are unfamiliar with these agencies. That indicates inadequate outreach to employers.

Some have suggested that VETS be moved to VA to get greater visibility over the programs. The House and Senate Veterans Affairs’ Committees certainly have greater influence over VA than DoL, but it can also be said that Labor is in the business of finding people work, and the programs should stay there. These are pros and cons that must be weighed. If such a thing were to happen, funding must be shifted from DoL to VA to cover program costs.

I am committed to improving VETS operations, and look forward to working with VVA and the rest of the veterans’ community to make that happen.

clothing donations button

Altarum Banner Ad




vva logo small©2006 - 2013, Vietnam Veterans of America. All Rights Reserved. 8719 Colesville Road, Suite 100, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Report Website Errors Here | Advertise