Connect With VVA VVA on Facebook Faces of Agent Orange on Twitter VVA on YouTube
Find A Service Officer
vietnam veterans of america
vva logo

March / April 2009

red star bulletThe Veteran Departments: Stayin' Alive | Lyons At The Wall | Child In The War Zone | Be Mine | President's Report | Letters | Government Affairs | TAPS | Region 9 Report | Constitution Committee Report | Convention Resolutions Committee Report | Veterans Incarcerated | Membership Affairs | Credentials Committee Report | Veterans Health Care | PTSD & Substance Abuse | POW/MIA Affairs | Veterans Benefits | Agent Orange/Dioxin | Women Veterans | Minority Affairs | Annual Committee Report: Government Affairs | ETABO | Public Affairs | Elections Committee Report | Homeless Veterans | Books In Review | Membership Notes | Locator | Reunions | AVVA Report | Calendar

2010: Jan/Feb
2009: Jan/Feb | mar/apr
| may/june | july/Aug | sept/oct | Nov/DeC
2008: Jan/Feb | mar/apr | may/june | july/Aug | sept/oct | Nov/DeC
2007: Jan/Feb | MAR/APR | MAY/JUNE | july/aug | SEPT/OCT | Nov/DeC
2006: July/Aug | SEPT/OCT | nov/dec

March / April 2009


What follows was reported by ABC News. It should be of interest to all Vietnam veterans who have illnesses that they feel resulted from exposure to dioxin—Agent Orange—during their service during the Vietnam War:

“The Supreme Court has turned down American and Vietnamese victims of Agent Orange who wanted to pursue lawsuits against companies that made the toxic chemical defoliant used in the Vietnam War. The justices offer no comment on their action, rejecting appeals in three separate cases, in favor of Dow Chemical, Monsanto, and other companies that made Agent Orange and other herbicides used by the military in Vietnam.

“All three cases had been dismissed by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. The appeals court said that the lawsuit brought by the Vietnamese plaintiffs could not go forward because Agent Orange was used to protect U.S. troops against ambush and not as a weapon of war against human populations.

“The other two suits were filed by U.S. veterans who got sick too late to claim a piece of the $180 million settlement with makers of the chemical in 1984. In 2006, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on whether those lawsuits could proceed.

“The appeals court ultimately said no to both. In one case, the court said companies are shielded from lawsuits brought by U.S. military veterans or their relatives because the law protects government contractors in certain circumstances who provide defective products. In the third suit, the appeals court ruled that the companies could transfer claims from state to federal courts.”

Gerson Smoger, the attorney who has been working on this issue pro bono, e-mailed the following:

“As many of you know, I have been working on the Agent Orange issue since 1991 when I was first asked by Adm. Zumwalt to assist the Agent Orange Coordinating Council. The Council, comprised of a broad array of veterans groups, was established to do two things: 1) to try to get benefits from the government for diseases caused by Agent Orange; and 2) to try to get compensation from the chemical companies for exposing our veterans to the toxic dioxin that was in their 2,4,5-T.

“As of January 1991, not a single disease was recognized for compensation by the U.S. government. While not all of the diseases we believe were caused by the ‘Agents’ are being compensated today, I believe we have come a long way since 1991 in getting the U.S. government to provide compensation for many veterans and their families.

“However, we received very distressing news regarding the lawsuits we filed against the companies who were truly responsible for the Agent Orange tragedy. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to take our request for certiorari in the Agent Orange cases. To put the Supreme Court’s refusal to review the case in perspective, I will briefly detail below the extent of the companies’ malicious conduct.

“1. There is absolutely no question that the chemical companies used defective manufacturing processes. They were aware that since the 1950s the German company Boehringer used a process that produced no detectable dioxin. However, that process was slower than the American companies wanted, because the American chemical companies were aware that faster production meant greater profits. Whereas the Germans slowly cooked their 2,4,5-T (the chemical which contained the dioxin contaminant) for 13 hours, the American companies, like Dow, used extremely high temperatures to cook it in as few as twenty minutes.

“However, the higher the temperature, the more dioxin that was produced. Because of this, the chemical manufacturers secretly tested their chemicals for dioxin. They did not tell the government how they made it (calling it proprietary). They did not tell the government dioxin was even in the chemicals. They did not tell the government that they secretly tested their product for levels of dioxin contamination. They did not tell the government that hundreds of their production workers were sick due to dioxin contamination. In fact, 76 of the chemical companies’ employees have been deposed and not one testified that he told the government about the dioxin contamination.

“2. A myth has been created by the chemical companies that the U.S. government somehow designed Agent Orange and that this was a special, unique chemical. This is not true. 2,4,5-T was not chosen for use in Vietnam because it was newly discovered. It was chosen because every year 50 million tons of 2,4,5-T were being sprayed on farms, along railroad tracks, and on the sides of roads. In fact, the U.S. government wanted a chemical that was already being made, because that was the only
way they could get enough produced for their needs in Vietnam.

“3. What we have found out, to the best of our ability, is that U.S. government officials believed that the chemicals being sprayed were safe. Many people do not know that more than one hundred government personnel have been deposed during the course of this litigation. Not a single one has ever testified to knowing that 2,4,5-T was contaminated with dioxin when it was sold to the government.

“What we absolutely do know is that the government—unlike the companies—did not even have the means to test for dioxin contamination in 2,4,5-T. And most importantly, the companies lied to the government. Even though hundreds of their workers suffered various diseases and they knew that dioxin was the most toxic chemical they had ever encountered, they certified to the U.S. government that not a single worker had ever suffered from a health problem while manufacturing 2,4,5-T.

“Now, despite literally years of work and knowing that we are right, we do not know that there is anything more that we can do…. The decision we have received does not go specifically to whether veterans were injured by the chemical companies’ products. Instead, the courts have, in my opinion, rather cynically held that we cannot even present this issue to a jury because even if the companies had not hidden everything from the government, our government would have used Agent Orange anyway. How we can possibly know that or possibly believe that is difficult for me to understand. At minimum, it should have been left up to a jury to decide. This cannot be the law, but it has been made the law in this case. ”

The Agent Orange/Dioxin and Toxic Exposures Committee: Buzz Sawyer, Chair; Billee Cullin, Vice Chair. Members: Wayne Cartier, Bob Caswell, Mike Demske, Bill Dumsick, Stan Goodwill, Allan Grant, Ken Holybee, Darrel Martin, Luther Newberry, George Newell, Alan Oates, Nathaniel Washington, John Weiss, and William Whaley. Special Advisors: Paul Sutton, Gary Jones, Carl Hytinen, Jack Alderson, Norm LaChapelle, Betty Mekdeci, Gerald Ney, Dr. Linda Schwartz, and Paul Kasper. Staff Coordinator: Bernie Edelman.






clothing donations button

Altarum Banner Ad




vva logo small©2006 - 2013, Vietnam Veterans of America. All Rights Reserved. 8719 Colesville Road, Suite 100, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Report Website Errors Here | Advertise